NEWSFLASH: What parts of Microsoft Windows are not controlled by the S.F. USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling

Its pretty simple to answer this question. The issue is in truth… So how many parts of the Microsoft infrastructure, Windows, and key Cloud Systems are not controlled in the US by the USDC 14-03629/WHA or internationally by the seven US6370629 frauds? Will Microsoft answer it for you – we suggest you ask them.

See our post inside Linked in as to which portions of Windows are controlled by the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling

Imagine what this does to Islamic Finance Systems relying on the application of Shariah? Its simply impossible to  implement them, or EU GDPR compliance in any form.

MSFT

If Windows and Azure/Cloud services are controlled by the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling, and also by the seven frauds (Australia AP54015/99, Brazil BR9904979A, Canada CA2287596a, EU EP0997808a3, Korea KR20000032593a, Japan JP2000163379a, and South Africa ZA9906799a)… then it also makes sense “this legal nightmare controls all software products built from the ten derivatives Microsoft has published without compliance with the US6370629 Settlement terms then, would it not”?

Those derivatives being those which are controlled under US6370629 Settlement terms US7511682, US7558884, US7577771, US7660914, US8188936, US20050243019, US20050243020, US20050262302, US20110314555, US9076128″. Controlled by Section 8.4 of the USDC 14-03629/WHA affirmed Settlement (download it here: https://patentandiprecoveries.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/contracts-sym00001-sym00011.pdf)?

You tell us? What do you think?

If Cloud Services in your Nation are controlled by the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling and impacted further by a criminal fraud pertaining to the seven Illegally filed and Abandoned instances of US6370629 like EP0997808a3 for instance… How can your nation legally use these materials?

NEWSFLASH: New brief as simple explanation on how us6370629 settlement controls location based services globally

See our new brief on Location Based Services and their use in GDPR and other requirements.

Click to access lbs-brief.pdf

 

Legal: Patent and IP Recoveries completes Move from Delaware to Wyoming State!

Patent and IP Recoveries has successfully moved from Delaware to Wyoming State Registration and is now formally operating from Wyoming State registration.

This was done for a number of reasons but generally speaking the Delaware small company law is much more complex and isnt favorable in a number of emerging circumstances. See the PAGE with a link to the Registration Receipt if you like, above.

The movement of the company was completed last week (Aug 22/23 2019) with a board notice and the re-registration in Wyoming.

Legal: California strips Court Access of Todd Glassey and Michael McNeil to prevent election fraud disclosure!

California State officials block enforcement of USDC 14-03629/WHA against the State of California by court frauds!

In blocking review and Disclosure of Election Fraud in California Electorate from Santa Cruz 17-CV-01908/Burdick, a process which would have invalidated hundreds and tens of thousands of felony convictions made by Judges who were participants in election frauds, Glassey and McNeil have been stripped of their access to California Courts and those of ANY STATE WHO WOULD HONOR THE CALIFORNIA RULING AS IT PERTAINS TO THEIR OWN ELECTIONS.

Santa Cruz’s Judge Burdick made this ruling to block the review “of how Santa Cruz County from which he was elected complied with the Federal Ruling requirements from USDC 14-03629/WHA”.

He also blocked “review of state Elected staff, including his own receipt of funds from companies like Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Apple and many others directly tied to the USDC 14-03629/WHA Ruling’s effects”.

The effect of this was to stifle enforcement in the US of the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling as it impacted the 2014, 16, and 18 elections as well as previous ones.

The ruling for instance was blocked for review by the Federal Election Commission created under the 2002 Help America Vote Act, one which made them responsible for certifying Voting Systems which they refused to do based on the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling as it impacted them and elections past and present which were illegally tied to and which violated the terms of us of US6370629 methods in commercially available voting systems without full section §8 terms compliance of the Settlement in those uses.

The last thing California Judges want is the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling reviewed since it will void many if not all of their rulings since those elections. Further, the ruling from the USDC very likely voided half or all of the seated State Supreme Court Justices by eliminating the legal validity of the six year reconfirmation vote.

As such, if this is true – California is left in a legal state of Limbo with no State Assembly or Senate to manage the State, no State Judges or other elected roles in any form, and keenly no elected Attorney General under whose authority to prosecute anyone, no State Secretary to  run the State Processes, no Lieutenant Governor or Governor to act as State Executives, and no State Elections Commissioner to act to replace them through new Elections. State Limbo is the best way to phrase that. The Seventh largest Economy on Earth, California is a void limbo based entity.

Interesting situation…

Program: Patent Stakes

The Patent and IP Recoveries grup announces Patent Stakes program (PSp).

This new stake based participation program allows individual and commercial investors to take stakes in a single or group of patents as a portfolio we file and provide licensing for.

  • Single patent instances
  • Patent family instances
  • Patent Portfolio

The intent is to allow investors and users to obtain early access and stake level participation from “Patent Applied For timeframes.

This provides for all levels of licensing for their own use and to participate in the processing and licensing as part of a Stake Pool member.

For more information on this unique new program please contact us directly.

LEGAL: DMCA requirements set by USDC 14-03629/WHA

DMCA requirements

The underlying US6370629 patent is expiring, but it is meaningless in regard to how the US District Court ruling for 14-03629/WHA effects surviving copyrighted Softwares.

The USDC 14-03629/WHA Ruling had unique and unexpected consequences in affirming section 8 requirements for the uses of the intellectual properties protected in US6370629 and US6393136 patents and the contractual controls for their use and licensing. Ones which persist until 2103 or later.

The Derivatives

Today, both patents have over 380 Derivatives (See each list at: ‘629, and ‘3126) in publication globally making them both Standards Enabling Patents (“SEP”) type patent publications.

Seven Frauds – the US6370629 instances illegally filed and abandoned

Additionally, there are a number of US6370629 instances which were illegally filed and then abandoned making the uses of US6370629 and it’s 275 or more derivatives a criminal antitrust events in many jurisdictions.

These frauds include Australia AP54015/99, Brazil BR9904979A, Canada CA2287596a, EU EP0997808a3, Republic of (South) Korea, KR20000032593a, Japan JP2000163379a, and South African ZA9906799a  when any software derived from US6370629 as well as any of the 275 or more published derivatives is sold into those jurisdictions it causes an additional  and ongoing endeavor as an antitrust matter.

The derivatives include listed there and above at links include 275 or more with these being just a few of them today:

Apple US6370629 derivatives controlled under US6370629 Settlement terms

US7710290, US8031050, US8060389, US8073565, US8108144, US8127246, US8175802, US8180379, US8204684, US8275352, US8290513, US8311526, US8332402, US8355862, US8359643, US8369867, US8385946, US8452529, US8463238, US8489669, US8538685, US8548735, US8644843, US8660530, US8670748, US8694026, US8738039, US8762056, US8774825, US8924144, US8930233, US8963686, US8977294, US8984059, US9066199, US9100793, US9109904,US9131342, US9237514, US9250092, US9310206, US9317867, US9414198, US2009000500

MSFT
US7511682, US7558884, US7577771, US7660914, US8188936, US20050243019, US20050243020, US20050262302, US20110314555, US9076128

Hp
US7477903, US7522925 *, US8086695, US8135798, US20110185408, USRE43070

IBM derivatives controlled under the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling
US20060031830, US6898628, US7000116, US7178031, US7752135, US20020138632, US20030135463, US20050015621, US20050060384, US20060015501

Sony
US7765163, US7843464, US8049766, US8184124, US8219495, US8286256, US8345062, US8838502, US20020188574, US20090113529

Symantec Corporation
US7640590, US7739494, US8312064, US8332947, US9038158.

The expiry of the underlying US6370629 patent does not change any of these requirements

There is a published brief here restating the following requirements:

  1. That any and all softwares or systems using those methods must accept any and all requirements stated in the Settlement documents per section 8.4 of the Judicially perfected Settlement terms.
  2. That any and all documents necessary to support that requirement must be created including updated end-user licenses and compliance terms agreement forms and the management program to support those operations
  3. That any and all softwares or systems using these methods are restricted to use under the laws of the State of California, and this means no other choice of law can be selected.

The impact of this to all Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Apple, eBay, PayPal, Cisco, Symantec, Sony, and others products speaks for itself. “No matter where on Earth those products are sold, they must apply only California law until they buy a release from those requirements.”

GDPR IMPLICATIONS

Think also how these derivatives and their being controlled by USDC 14-03629/WHA rulings perfecting of the US6370629 Settlement also impacts the GDPR Compliance. See our page on it here.

NEWSFLASH: PRA splits and forms US and foreign instances

The PRA has split

Its happened, the Patent and IP Recoveries LLC has done what his honors, Judge Bill Alsup told us we would need to do, we split into several Association LLCs each legally and nationally separate.

The second LLC itself was formed in an Eastern European CIS nation of Belarus and all Frauds and the sale of the 3 CRADAs separated to it.

The US instance itself is now only a limited beneficiary in the enforcement rights to satisfy certain California court orders…

We are looking for homes to spin the regional frauds out into for ME/Africa, Asia, and South American Operarions ae well.

This was done through a full transfer of ownership, of all key Frauds under the US entity and the three CRADAs.

The net-net is simply that the US Entity as a non-regional center could not offer settlement on anything but the US instances of Section 8 damages and copyright claims from the USDC 14-03629/WHA ruling, but it can do that. Our new structure takes advantage of regional international law to do the other damage enforcement matters.

The Eastern European Entity now controls the Frauds around US6370639 and US6393126. These include Australia AP54015/99, Brazil BR9904979A, Canada CA2287596a, EU EP0997808a3, Republic of (South) Korea, KR20000032593a, Japan JP2000163379a, and South African ZA9906799a as well as any of the 275 or more published derivatives which aresold into those jurisdictions causing an antitrust matter.

More news coming!

NEWSFLASH: European Commission served Notice of War Crimes Complaint.

NEWSFLASH:  21-September-2018 – FOR WIDEST POSSIBLE RELEASE – The EC has been Served Notice of War Crime and their infringement

As a supplement to the ICC #336/18 War Crime filing, The European Commission was served notice informally through President Juncker and his Director General of Competition both

“of the use and deployment of commerce, banking, and their weapons using EP0997808A3 or the related Canadian Patent Frauds IP”.

The European Commission was asked to formally notify their Members, and notice was independently served against the German and UK Governments.

Filing Dates

The implications are simply that:

“no European Commission and their European Union’s Member State can allow any party including NATO Nations to use in commerce, or to deploy goods or weapons, operate their Bankings including those of the Rothschild Cartel, which illegally use US6370629. Either in themselves or to any nation within their Jurisdictions, collectively and individually.

Especially to  and which are controlled by one or more of the other Illegal US6370629 Patents which was filed and abandoned.”

 

The process causes a War Crime to occur as well as an Anti-trust Matter directly.

The Documents:

Amendments

Briefs


ICC finally in 2019 decides to not prosecute filing, and amended filing coming. Stay tuned for more information.

NEWSFLASH: Crowdfunding vehicle for partial stake standing for US6370629/US6393126 Program

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 7-May-2018 Widest Distribution.

Patent and IP Recoveries announces a special gift for supporting our Crowdfunding initiative for our US6370629/US6393126 enforcement matter in Santa Cruz County Courts

Patent and IP Recoveries has reserved three stakes in the Shared Recovery Pool for the US6370629/US6393126 litigation now underway in Santa Cruz County Superior Court.

The case, 17-CV-01908 is setup to enforce the terms and conditions of the US6370629/US6393126 Settlements Section 8 terms against any and all parties acting in our through the State of California. That includes forcing the State itself to enforce those terms against any Silicon Valley and related technology providers using or reselling controlled IP and softwares.

The terms provide a partial stake standing and a mechanism for smaller investors to get into the recovery pool, or just a thank-you for parties wishing to help us clean up the Software Fraud running rampant in California today. For more information see this link and feel free to contact us.

All parties needing a Release from US6370629’s and US6393126’s Settlements will be offered an OPEN SOURCE alternative Payment Model which will significantly reduce their Settlement obligations. Open Sourcing all of the worlds softwares are key to keeping this type of nightmare from happening again.

But money it tight and since we are approaching the everyday Man and Woman on the Street, we thought it appropriate to incentivize them as well. For each $1000 gifted into the Crowd Funding for Legal Enforcement Action, parties will receive a percentage standing (1/20 of 1% respectively) in the recoveries of the litigation. Currently litigation demands are for full enforcement of the section 8 terms and a 3.8B damage claim against the State itself. See the link below for more information or contact us directly.

https://wp.me/P9Ppsf-3S

 

 

NEWSFLASH: Patent and IP Recoveries Global Business Unit Project

NEWS FLASH — For Immediate Publication, Unlimited Distribution:  The Patent and IP Recoveries LLC group of companies is looking to expand its set of Global (non-US) operating Business Units for “collecting and marketing IP pertaining to those National Jurisdictions”.

The Minsk Belarus instance of Patent and IP Recoveries LLC, originally of Delaware, and now of Wyoming US, came online Feb1-2019 and is now operating fully independently from the US instance.

Both have their own property and liquidation projects underway, and can service their community and relative theatres of operations best.

This is because often the best legal recovery for distressed IP is in the Nations it pertains to, rather than  in Umbrella Company nations like The Isle of Jersey or Republic of Ireland as many of the Tech Sector use to package their IP in.

We are looking for local Investors and Partners in each Jurisdiction in this unique endeavor.

The intended Business Unit model is “as Joint Ventures with local Investors and Entities representing the Judicial Operations of those Nations” which we feel is necessary to properly meet any and all local operating requirements.

Each jurisdiction is different, and while they may all be signatories to the Rome Statute, or TRIPS (and or related Trade) agreements, those recovery actions are better suited in their local Courts and in concert with their local Government Agencies.

Business Unit Targets – Looking for regional Investors and Local Management Teams

Current envisioned targets include EU(Zurich/Germany/France/Greece/Italy), the Russian Federation, One or more of the “Med Nations” as well as Gulf States (including potentially Turkey, Dubai, Qatar, Israel), The ASIA region focusing on both China, the Koreas, and Japan, and the UK, and many Commonwealth Nations initially. Expansion from that platform is planned into South America, the whole of Africa to create a Boutique type operation in each key Jurisdiction for addressing the massive amount of Distressed IP.

Cultural Art – a forgotten IP

Additionally, because we are finding ourselves wanting to open Business Units in a Number of Jurisdictions, we feel that in addition to Distresses IP that the emerging Cultural Art wealth in each National Jurisdiction also offers a unique opportunity to bring that culture to the world as a byproduct of our actions. We love art, what can we say?

We think the History through Art is a key value proposition and plan to expand into this area with online Apps representing individual Artists and the collectives representing them today.

Contacting us

Feel free to contact us for how you can participate and as always we are looking for both partners and investors who want to participate in this new Distressed IP and Company Asset M&A/Liquidation Program.

Email us at PatRec@ProtonMail.COM for more information.